Right Atrial Mechanisms of Atrial Fibrillation in a Rat Model of Right Heart Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Conditions affecting the right heart, including diseases of the lungs and pulmonary circulation, promote atrial fibrillation (AF), but the mechanisms are poorly understood. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine whether right heart disease promotes atrial arrhythmogenesis in a rat model of pulmonary hypertension (PH) and, if so, to define the underlying mechanisms. METHODS: PH was induced in male Wistar rats with a single intraperitoneal injection of 60 mg/kg of monocrotaline, and rats were studied 21 days later when right heart disease was well developed. AF vulnerability was assessed in vivo and in situ, and mechanisms were defined by optical mapping, histochemistry, and biochemistry. RESULTS: Monocrotaline-treated rats developed increased right ventricular pressure and mass, along with right atrial (RA) enlargement. AF/flutter was inducible in 32 of 32 PH rats (100%) in vivo and 11 of 12 (92%) in situ, versus 2 of 32 (6%) and 2 of 12 (17%), respectively, in control rats (p < 0.001 vs. PH for each). PH rats had significant RA (16.1 ± 0.5% of cross-sectional area, vs. 3.0 ± 0.6% in control) and left atrial (LA: 11.8 ± 0.5% vs. 5.4 ± 0.8% control) fibrosis. Multiple extracellular matrix proteins, including collagen 1 and 3, fibronectin, and matrix metalloproteinases 2 and 9, were up-regulated in PH rat RA. Optical mapping revealed significant rate-dependent RA conduction slowing and rotor activity, including stable rotors in 4 of 11 PH rats, whereas no significant conduction slowing or rotor activity occurred in the LA of monocrotaline-treated rats. Transcriptomic analysis revealed differentially enriched genes related to hypertrophy, inflammation, and fibrosis in RA of monocrotaline-treated rats versus control. Biochemical results in PH rats were compared with those of AF-prone rats with atrial remodeling in the context of left ventricular dysfunction due to myocardial infarction: myocardial infarction rat LA shared molecular motifs with PH rat RA. CONCLUSIONS: Right heart disease produces a substrate for AF maintenance due to RA re-entrant activity, with an underlying substrate prominently involving RA fibrosis and conduction abnormalities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".