MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2972291221 · doi:10.1017/cjn.2019.261

Epilepsy Related Death: the London Health Sciences Center Experience

2019· article· en· W2972291221 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Q Zhang, LC Ang

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEpilepsy research and treatment
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpilepsyMedicineAutopsyNeuropathologyHippocampal sclerosisCause of deathCortical dysplasiaPediatricsPopulationAccidentalPathologyDiseasePsychiatryTemporal lobe

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Premature mortality among epilepsy patients is well recognized. Except a few identifiable causes of unnatural death, more than half of the epilepsy related death remains unexplained after extensive workup. These cases are classified as sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP). SUDEP incidence varies significantly depending on the population, the methods documenting cause of death and the availability of Neuropathological examination. An accurate diagnosis of the cause of death is needed for epilepsy related death. The goal of this study is to present the relevant clinical data, the general autopsy and Neuropathology findings of epilepsy related death investigated in London Health Sciences Center during the period of 2000 to 2011. We identified 71 cases with known history of chronic epilepsy. In the 29 cases of epilepsy associated death, the causes of death have been classified as cardiac, pulmonary, accidental (e.g. drowning), toxic (e.g. drug overdose) and non-related causes. Forty two cases are considered to be SUDEP, and were categorized according to the recently proposed SUDEP Definition and Classification. Half of the SUDEP cases have no specific Neuropathological findings. The most common identifiable lesions in SUDEP cases are perinatal/neonatal destructive lesions (29%), hippocampal sclerosis (24%), and focal cortical dysplasia (20%). These are followed by neuronal heterotopia (9%), previous head trauma (9%), and cavernoma (5%). LEARNING OBJECTIVES This presentation will enable the learner to: 1. Review cause of death in epilepsy related deaths 2. Discuss the practice guideline in neuropathology autopsy of epilepsy related deaths

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques→Same topicEpilepsy research and treatment→French-language works237,207→