MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2972301242 · doi:10.1104/pp.19.00722

ECERIFERUM11/C-TERMINAL DOMAIN PHOSPHATASE-LIKE2 Affects Secretory Trafficking

2019· article· en· W2972301242 on OpenAlexafffund
Lin Shi, Gillian H. Dean, Huanquan Zheng, Miranda J. Meents, Tegan M. Haslam, George W. Haughn, Ljerka Kunst

Bibliographic record

VenuePLANT PHYSIOLOGY · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Surface Properties and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSecretionCell biologyArabidopsisArabidopsis thalianaSecretory pathwaySecretory proteinDephosphorylationBiologyExtracellularPhosphataseExtracellular matrixChemistryBiochemistryPhosphorylationMutantGeneGolgi apparatusEndoplasmic reticulum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Secretory trafficking is highly conserved in all eukaryotic cells and is required for secretion of proteins as well as extracellular matrix components. In plants, the export of cuticular waxes and various cell wall components relies on secretory trafficking, but the molecular mechanisms underlying their secretion are not well understood. In this study, we characterize the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) dwarf eceriferum11 (cer11) mutant and we show that it exhibits reduced stem cuticular wax deposition, aberrant seed coat mucilage extrusion, and delayed secondary cell wall columella formation, as well as a block in secretory GFP trafficking. Cloning of the CER11 gene revealed that it encodes a C-TERMINAL DOMAIN PHOSPHATASE-LIKE2 (CPL2) protein. Thus, secretory trafficking in plant cells in general, and secretion of extracellular matrix constituents in developing epidermal cells in particular, involves a dephosphorylation step catalyzed by CER11/CPL2.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.905
Threshold uncertainty score0.966

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLANT PHYSIOLOGYSame topicPlant Surface Properties and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207