MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2972308597 · doi:10.4000/rfp.7625

MAURY Yolande, KOVACS Susan & CONDETTE Sylvie (dir.). Bibliothèques en mouvement. Innover, fonder, pratiquer de nouveaux espaces de savoir

2018· article· fr· W2972308597 on OpenAlexaff
Christiane Étévé

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue française de pédagogie · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsBibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtEmancipationPolitical scienceLawPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Que de chemin parcouru depuis les anciennes bibliothèques royales ouvertes au xviiie siècle à une élite lettrée jusqu’aux médiathèques actuelles aux ressources documentaires sur supports multiples et aux nombreux services aux usagers, sur place et en ligne ! Pour accomplir ce parcours, il a fallu les initiatives visionnaires de quelques pionnières et pionniers du xixe siècle, soutenues par des mouvements sociaux et leurs projets d’émancipation, confirmées par des compétences professionnelles ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.995
Threshold uncertainty score0.110

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.009
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0330.019

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.159
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue française de pédagogieSame topicCultural Insights and Digital ImpactsFrench-language works237,207