MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2972342838 · doi:10.4000/rdlc.6255

Le plurilinguisme en Alsace : les représentations sociales comme ressources ou outils de la description sociolinguistique

2008· article· fr· W2972342838 on OpenAlexaff
Arlette Bothorel-Witz

Bibliographic record

VenueRecherches en didactique des langues et des cultures · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLinguistic and Sociocultural Studies
Canadian institutionsMinistère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (Québec)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSociologyHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans nos recherches sur le contact des langues et le plurilinguisme en Alsace, une place centrale a été donnée aux représentations sociales telles qui ont été intégrées par un groupe ou un individu (représentations stabilisées) mais aussi telles qu’elles peuvent se reconstruire ou se modifier dans l’interaction. Á partir d’exemples relevant de trois études de terrain et de différents espaces sociolinguistiques, il est proposé de s’interroger sur l’apport du modèle des représentations pour la description sociolinguistique et, partant, sur les références théoriques qui permettent de rendre compte de la relative stabilité des représentations instituées, d’une part, de leur dynamique et de leurs fluctuations, d’autre part.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.399
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.008
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.288
GPT teacher head0.459
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRecherches en didactique des langues et des culturesSame topicLinguistic and Sociocultural StudiesFrench-language works237,207