Utilización de Zotero como gestor bibliográfico web en estudiantes universitarios
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El presente articulo, tiene como objetivo conocer la utilizacion del gestor bibliografico Zotero en los estudiantes que tomaron las catedras relacionadas a las (Tecnologias de la informacion y Comunicacion) TICs en la Facultad de Salud Publica en los periodos academicos comprendidos entre Marzo – Julio 2013 y Abril – Agosto 2016. Se realizo un estudio descriptivo, mediante la aplicacion de una encuesta difundida a traves de redes sociales, correos electronicos. En el analisis estadistico se utilizo la Tecnica de Analisis de Datos Textuales (AEDT) para preguntas abiertas. El 88,4% de los encuestados considera de facil instalacion la herramienta en analisis, el buscador Google Academico es el mas utilizado con 82,6%, la norma Vancouver lo utilizan el 73,3% de los encuestados. Se reconoce la facilidad de la utilizacion del complemento Zotero en la gestion bibliografica por parte de los estudiantes participantes en el estudio.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it