MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2972367356 · doi:10.1117/12.2528826

EUV Stokes reflection polarimeter using gold coated mirrors for use up to 150 eV photon energy

2019· article· en· W2972367356 on OpenAlexaff
Gillian Black, Xiaoyu Cui, Sergey Gorovikov, Feizhou He, Grant Henneberg, M. A. MacDonald, B. Yates, Lucia Zuin

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced X-ray Imaging Techniques
Canadian institutionsCanadian Light Source (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolarimeterOpticsStokes parametersPhysicsExtreme ultraviolet lithographyPolarizerPolarization (electrochemistry)PhotonPhoton energyPolarimetryAzimuthOptoelectronicsMaterials scienceScatteringChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An EUV Stokes polarimeter designed for operation up to 150 eV photon energy has been fabricated and commissioned (with red, green and violet light). The polarimeter consists of two identical 4-mirror optical groups acting as a phase retarder and analyser respectively. Each group is capable of independent azimuthal rotation about the beam without deviating the beam. The mirrors are gold coated and operating at 80° angle of incidence. Such an instrument can determine both the full Stokes vector of the incoming light and the optical constants (polarizance and phase delay) of the optical elements of the polarimeter, which are then translated into the optical constants (n and k) for gold and compared to the literature values.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced X-ray Imaging TechniquesFrench-language works237,207