MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2972370396 · doi:10.23919/acc.2019.8814344

Min-max economic MPC of networked control systems with transmission delays

2019· article· en· W2972370396 on OpenAlexaff
Yawen Mao, Su Liu, Benjamin Decardi‐Nelson, Jinfeng Liu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Model predictive controlController (irrigation)ActuatorScheme (mathematics)Computer scienceNonlinear systemProcess (computing)Transmission (telecommunications)Networked control systemSequence (biology)Control systemContinuous stirred-tank reactorControl (management)Process controlOptimal controlControl engineeringEngineeringMathematical optimizationMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, we consider a min-max economic model predictive control (EMPC) for nonlinear networked control systems (NCSs) subject to external disturbances and transmission delays in both sensor-to-controller and controller-to-actuator channels. The min-max EMPC scheme incorporates the disturbances within the design of the model predictive controller by optimizing the input for the worst case along the predictions, and thus can achieve better performance than the normal EMPC scheme. The semi-feedback min-max optimization algorithm is used to generate the control sequence to compensate for delayed control input. Simulation results of a numerical example and a CSTR process example are provided to demonstrate the applicability and effectiveness of our approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.148
Teacher spread0.147 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Control Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207