MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2972444372 · doi:10.37127/25393995.35

Dossier: tecnologías poéticas en el arte contemporáneo

2019· article· es· W2972444372 on OpenAlex
Tatiana Navallo, Hernán Ulm

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista académica estesis · 2019
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCommunication and COVID-19 Impact
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El dossier indaga en torno a las configuraciones de lo sensible en el mundo contemporáneo. La percepeción del mundo y de nosotros mismos no es natural, neutra o pura. Siempre está construida a partir de unconjunto de reglas que definen lo que llamamos un “ritual de la percepción”. En este sentido, los agenciamientos sociales son, en primer lugar, agenciamientos de lo sensible. Las reglas que operan en la configuración de la sensibilidad pueden tener dos devenires: un devenir técnico y otro artístico. A partir del siglo XX, el agenciamiento de producción de sensibilidad opera a través bioinformatización, mediante cálculos algorítmico digitales. Los textos que se presentan a continuación intentan una reflexión crítica que pone de relieve los alcances de esta mutación, tomando como eje conductor la cuestión del arte.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.945
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.355 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it