MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2972517792 · doi:10.1515/forum-2019-0275

On hyperquadrics containing projective varieties

2020· preprint· en· W2972517792 on OpenAlexaff
Euisung Park

Bibliographic record

VenueForum Mathematicum · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicTensor decomposition and applications
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersNational Research Foundation of Korea
KeywordsVariety (cybernetics)MathematicsCodimensionProjective varietyLemma (botany)Pure mathematicsProjective spaceDegree (music)Fano planeGeneralizationTwisted cubicQuadratic equationProjective testCombinatoricsDiscrete mathematicsMathematical analysisComplex projective spaceGeometryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Classical Castelnuovo Lemma shows that the number of linearly independent quadratic equations of a nondegenerate irreducible projective variety of codimension c is at most ( c + 1 2 ) {{{c+1}\choose{2}}} and the equality is attained if and only if the variety is of minimal degree. Also G. Fano’s generalization of Castelnuovo Lemma implies that the next case occurs if and only if the variety is a del Pezzo variety. Recently, these results are extended to the next case in [E. Park, On hypersurfaces containing projective varieties, Forum Math. 27 2015, 2, 843–875]. This paper is intended to complete the classification of varieties satisfying at least ( c + 1 2 ) - 3 {{{c+1}\choose{2}}-3} linearly independent quadratic equations. Also we investigate the zero set of those quadratic equations and apply our results to projective varieties of degree ≥ 2 ⁢ c + 1 {\geq 2c+1} .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueForum MathematicumSame topicTensor decomposition and applicationsFrench-language works237,207