MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2972517792 · doi:10.1515/forum-2019-0275

On hyperquadrics containing projective varieties

2020· preprint· en· W2972517792 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueForum Mathematicum · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicTensor decomposition and applications
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersNational Research Foundation of Korea
KeywordsVariety (cybernetics)MathematicsCodimensionProjective varietyLemma (botany)Pure mathematicsProjective spaceDegree (music)Fano planeGeneralizationTwisted cubicQuadratic equationProjective testCombinatoricsDiscrete mathematicsMathematical analysisComplex projective spaceGeometryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Classical Castelnuovo Lemma shows that the number of linearly independent quadratic equations of a nondegenerate irreducible projective variety of codimension c is at most <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:mo>(</m:mo> <m:mfrac> <m:mrow> <m:mi>c</m:mi> <m:mo>+</m:mo> <m:mn>1</m:mn> </m:mrow> <m:mn>2</m:mn> </m:mfrac> <m:mo>)</m:mo> </m:mrow> </m:math> {{{c+1}\choose{2}}} and the equality is attained if and only if the variety is of minimal degree. Also G. Fano’s generalization of Castelnuovo Lemma implies that the next case occurs if and only if the variety is a del Pezzo variety. Recently, these results are extended to the next case in [E. Park, On hypersurfaces containing projective varieties, Forum Math. 27 2015, 2, 843–875]. This paper is intended to complete the classification of varieties satisfying at least <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mo>(</m:mo> <m:mfrac> <m:mrow> <m:mi>c</m:mi> <m:mo>+</m:mo> <m:mn>1</m:mn> </m:mrow> <m:mn>2</m:mn> </m:mfrac> <m:mo>)</m:mo> </m:mrow> <m:mo>-</m:mo> <m:mn>3</m:mn> </m:mrow> </m:math> {{{c+1}\choose{2}}-3} linearly independent quadratic equations. Also we investigate the zero set of those quadratic equations and apply our results to projective varieties of degree <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:mi/> <m:mo>≥</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mn>2</m:mn> <m:mo>⁢</m:mo> <m:mi>c</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mo>+</m:mo> <m:mn>1</m:mn> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> </m:math> {\geq 2c+1} .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.805
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it