MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

S15-02 SESSION 15: PLANNING/IMAGING - PART I DEVELOPMENT OF BONE CUTTING INSTRUMENTATION IN THE APPLICATION OF ROBOTIC ASSISTED CRANIOSYNOSTOSIS SURGERY USING THE DA VINCI PLATFORM.

2019· article· en· W2972529026 on OpenAlexaff
Chris Forrest, Andy Gordon, Thomas Looi, Guoliang Wu, James M. Drake

Bibliographic record

VenuePlastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCraniofacial Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFinite element methodSession (web analytics)SoftwareComputer scienceVisualizationUltrasonic sensorEngineering drawingSimulationEngineeringArtificial intelligenceAcousticsStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: The aim of this project was to develop a bone cutting tool for the da Vinci robotic platform with application in craniofacial procedures for the correction of craniosynostosis with advantages of enhanced surgeon ergonomics, improved bone cutting precision, visualization and minimal access surgery. Methods: In order to assess the feasibility of a robotic-assisted approach, a custom ultrasonic tool was developed to address the unique challenges of accessing the required cut locations on the skull using the remote-center-of-motion configuration of the da Vinci Si system. To address these limitations, new blade geometry was developed to allow for cutting at any angle of attack using a genetic shape optimization algorithm in finite element software. The tool was also designed to maximize length and minimize diameter to be suitable for minimally invasive access. Over 200 iterations of blade design, with cutting up to 4 mm and a 0.5 mm kerf were assessed. The error between finite element model predictions and testing averaged 1% (for prediction of shape and location of modal shapes). Results: A custom ultrasonic tool was developed to address the unique challenges of accessing the required cut locations on the skull using the remote-center-of-motion configuration of the da Vinci Si system. A key advantage of the da Vinci system are the highly dexterous wristed instruments; however, it is infeasible to develop a wristed ultrasonic tool due to high cycles and stresses. To address these limitations, new blade geometry was developed to allow for cutting at any angle of attack using a genetic shape optimization algorithm in finite element software. The tool was also designed to maximize length and minimize diameter to be suitable for minimally invasive access. Over 200 iterations of blade design, with cutting up to 4 mm and a 0.5 mm kerf were assessed. The error between finite element model predictions and testing averaged 1% (for prediction of shape and location of modal shapes). Bone substitute and animal bone were used for testing. 6 cuts total each cut 40 mm in length, 3 mm in depth (3 cuts using Bonesaw sample PCF40, 3 cuts using Bonesaw sample PCF50, Bonesaw samples: PCF40 (0.64 g/cc) and PCF50 (0.80 g/cc) were made and analyzed for time per cut (cutting speed), forces on sample (ATI Gamma), cutting motion/method (video recorded) and soft tissue damage (silicon pad). Data to be presented. Conclusion: Preliminary work has demonstrated an effective blade design that is amenable to application in bone cutting using piezo-electric technology using the da Vinci Si platform. Application in a simulated model for endoscopic strip craniectomy will be presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.560

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global OpenSame topicCraniofacial Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207