Recombinant Pyriform Silk Fiber Mechanics Are Modulated by Wet-Spinning Conditions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pyriform silk is a critically important fiber in spider web construction. It functions in a glue-coated attachment disc to form junctions in spider webs, connecting the web to disparate materials. Despite the biological importance of this silk, both natural and recombinant pyriform silk have yet to be structurally or mechanically characterized. In this study, we demonstrate recombinant production of a 477 amino acid protein based on Argiope argentata pyriform silk. This pyriform silk protein shows α-helicity in both an aqueous buffer and in a fluorinated acid- and alcohol-based spinning dope. Wet-spinning produced fibers having no visible defects in surface or cross-sectional analysis, with mechanical behavior varying as a function of postspin stretching conditions and correlating to loss of α-helicity in the fibrous state. Multiple conditions gave rise to fibers that are both strong and extensible, contrasting with some other silks that are biased toward being strong or extensible. This behavior is strikingly similar to recombinant aciniform silk, despite distinct primary structuring and composition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".