Ni kaakiihtwaamaan itootamihk waapamishoon aan mii wiichaytoowuk: I am practice reflected in relationships
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Michif-Métis denotes a way of life that is bound to specific political, historical, cultural and linguistic ethos, with specific ties to complex kinship systems with humans, earth and cosmological beings. As a Michif woman, growing up away from my relatives and land in Manitoba, I had always felt that the tether that connects my spiritual being to my ancestors was frayed because I did not grow up in a close-knit Michif community. I realized that it is not necessarily where you are that matters, but it is about how we are practising the relationships in the places we find ourselves. Through an animate and kinetic journey expressed by layering text and photos, this article is an attempt to peel back the layers and reveal some of the nuances and con/textualizations of being and becoming Michif. I explore my own expressions and practices of my self-understandings through my interactions within places in and near Mohkinstsis, Calgary, that allow me to express and affirm ni kaakiihtwaamaan itootamihk waapamishoon aan mii wiichaytoowuk – ‘I am practice reflected in relationships’.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".