MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2972550233 · doi:10.1386/btwo_00004_1

Ni kaakiihtwaamaan itootamihk waapamishoon aan mii wiichaytoowuk: I am practice reflected in relationships

2019· article· en· W2972550233 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueBook 2 0 · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicResearch in Social Sciences
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Michif-Métis denotes a way of life that is bound to specific political, historical, cultural and linguistic ethos, with specific ties to complex kinship systems with humans, earth and cosmological beings. As a Michif woman, growing up away from my relatives and land in Manitoba, I had always felt that the tether that connects my spiritual being to my ancestors was frayed because I did not grow up in a close-knit Michif community. I realized that it is not necessarily where you are that matters, but it is about how we are practising the relationships in the places we find ourselves. Through an animate and kinetic journey expressed by layering text and photos, this article is an attempt to peel back the layers and reveal some of the nuances and con/textualizations of being and becoming Michif. I explore my own expressions and practices of my self-understandings through my interactions within places in and near Mohkinstsis, Calgary, that allow me to express and affirm ni kaakiihtwaamaan itootamihk waapamishoon aan mii wiichaytoowuk – ‘I am practice reflected in relationships’.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.801
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.419
Teacher spread0.344 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it