MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2972632616 · doi:10.1214/20-aihp1092

Stochastic optimal transport with free end time

2021· preprint· fr· W2972632616 on OpenAlexafffund
Samer Dweik, Nassif Ghoussoub, Young‐Heon Kim, Aaron Zeff Palmer

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnales de l Institut Henri Poincaré Probabilités et Statistiques · 2021
Typepreprint
Languagefr
FieldMathematics
TopicPoint processes and geometric inequalities
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsConvexityBounded functionOptimal stoppingMathematicsMonotonic functionEulerian pathApplied mathematicsVariational inequalityMathematical optimizationOrder (exchange)LagrangianMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider a stochastic transportation problem between two prescribed probability distributions (a source and a target) over processes with general drift dependence and with free end times. First, and in order to establish a dual principle, we associate two equivalent formulations of the primal problem in order to guarantee its convexity and lower semi-continuity with respect to the source and target distributions. We exhibit an equivalent Eulerian formulation, whose dual variational principle is given by Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman type variational inequalities. In the case where the drift is bounded, regularity results on the minimizers of the Eulerian problem then enable us to prove attainment in the corresponding dual problem. We also address attainment when the drift component of the cost defining Lagrangian L is superlinear L≈|u|p with 1<p<2, in which case the setting is reminiscent of our approach – in a previous work – on deterministic controlled transport problems with free end time. We finally address criteria under which the optimal drift and stopping time are unique, namely strict convexity in the drift component and monotonicity in time of the Lagrangian.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnales de l Institut Henri Poincaré Probabilités et StatistiquesSame topicPoint processes and geometric inequalitiesFrench-language works237,207