MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2972680698 · doi:10.69554/yewc8568

CRE: Are we approaching an inflection point?

2014· article· en· W2972680698 on OpenAlexaff
Chris Kane

Bibliographic record

VenueCorporate real estate journal · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicLeadership and Management in Organizations
Canadian institutionsWorkplace Health, Safety and Compensation Commission
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInflection pointInflectionPoint (geometry)Computer scienceMathematicsArtificial intelligenceGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the virtual world currently revolutionising when, where and how people work, this paper is a call to arms for employers and employees to change the way they think about the workplace. The author wishes for all CRE employees to begin talking about new ways the work ‘place’ can be perceived, and entreats us to think of CRE employees as ‘value deliverers’, as opposed to ‘cost controllers’. The focus must shift towards people rather than place, because the work ‘place’ is now all around us, accessible from anywhere. This is something the CRE industry must take advantage of in order to wring the maximum amount of value from the ever changing world of current big business.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.523
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCorporate real estate journalSame topicLeadership and Management in OrganizationsFrench-language works237,207