MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2972721121

Efeito do Kinesio taping sobre a dor, função física, mobilidade, marcha e desempenho muscular de mulheres com osteoartrite de joelhos: um ensaio clínico aleatorizado

2015· article· pt· W2972721121 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jennifer Granja Peixoto

Bibliographic record

VenueAmericanae (AECID Library) · 2015
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldEngineering
TopicLower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWOMACMedicinePhysical therapyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationOsteoarthritis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the most common worldwide musculoskeletal diseases and the joint most commonly affected is the knee. The most common symptom is pain, although there is also loss of function and mobility, and reduced gait speed and performance of the knee and hip muscles. These deficits are more pronounced in women, than in men. Kinesiotaping (KT) is a technique that includes the application of elastic bandages, to reduce pain and stimulate the muscular activity. Objectives: To investigate the effects of the addition of the KT application over the gluteus maximus muscle to the rectus femoris on pain, physical function, functional mobility, gait, and muscular performance in women with bilateral knee OA. Methods: For this pilot blinded randomized controlled trial, 52 women with a mean age of 66±10 years, were randomly allocated to two experimental groups. The experimental group I (EGI) received the KT application over the rectus femoris muscle and the EG II received the KT application over both rectus femoris and gluteus maximus muscles. Pain and perceived physical function were evaluated by the Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), functional mobility by the Timed Up and Go test (TUG), temporal spatial gait parameters by the GAITRite system, and isokinetic performance of knee extensors and hip external rotators by the Biodex dynamometer. All outcomes were assessed at baseline and after 48 hours of KT application. Mixed ANOVAs (2X2) with repeated measures, followed by pre-planned contrasts were employed to assess main and interaction effects between the groups and time, with a significance level of 5%. Results: The analyses revealed significant effects of the KT application on pain, perceived physical function, gait speed, and performance of the knee extensor muscles for both groups, without interaction. No effects were observed on measures of functional mobility and performance of the hip external rotators. Conclusions: The addition of the KT application over the gluteus maximus muscle did not result in greater gains, compared to the application over only the rectus femoris muscle. The effects on pain, perceived physical function, and gait speed were statistically and clinically significant. Although statistically significant, the improvements in performance of the knee extensor muscles were probably not clinically relevant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmericanae (AECID Library)Same topicLower Extremity Biomechanics and PathologiesFrench-language works237,207