MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2972744182 · doi:10.23919/acc.2019.8815219

A Mean-Field Team Approach to Minimize the Spread of Infection in a Network

2019· article· en· W2972744182 on OpenAlexaff
Jalal Arabneydi, Amir G. Aghdam

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicComplex Network Analysis Techniques
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematical optimizationPopulationComputer scienceMarkov processMarkov chainStochastic processFinite setConvolution (computer science)Dynamic network analysisProbability distributionMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a stochastic dynamic control strategy is presented to prevent the spread of an infection over a homogeneous network. The infectious process is persistent, i.e., it continues to contaminate the network once it is established. It is assumed that there is a finite set of network management options available such as degrees of nodes and promotional plans to minimize the number of infected nodes while taking the implementation cost into account. The network is modeled by an exchangeable controlled Markov chain, whose transition probability matrices depend on three parameters: the selected network management option, the state of the infectious process, and the empirical distribution of infected nodes (with not necessarily a linear dependence). Borrowing some techniques from mean-field team theory the optimal strategy is obtained for any finite number of nodes using dynamic programming decomposition and the convolution of some binomial probability mass functions. For infinite-population networks, the optimal solution is described by a Bellman equation. It is shown that the infinite-population strategy is a meaningful sub-optimal solution for finite-population networks if a certain condition holds. The theoretical results are verified by an example of rumor control in social networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.686
Threshold uncertainty score0.513

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicComplex Network Analysis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207