MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2972773739 · doi:10.32622/ijrat.742019202

Phytochemical Screening of Murraya koenigii (L.) Spreng

2019· article· en· W2972773739 on OpenAlexaff
Pujan Pandya, Sanjukta Rajhans, Falguni R Patel, Archana Mankad, Rakesh Rawal, Nainesh R. Modi

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Research in Advent Technology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMorinda citrifolia extract uses
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMurrayaPhytochemicalTraditional medicineChemistryMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Murraya koenigii (L.) Spreng., commonly known as curry leaf tree is well known in Ayurvedic medicinal system for its varied pharmacological activities like anticancer activity, antioxidant activity, anti-inflammatory activity, anthelmintic activity, antidiabetic and antimicrobial activity. The leaves of this tree had been commonly used to enhance the flavour in culinary purposes for its specific taste and aroma. It's Stem part is commonly used as datun for oral health care purposes.The secondary metabolites present in the plant are also known for its different pharmacological activities. The present study focuses on preliminary qualitative phytochemical Screening and analysis from the hydroalcoholic extracts of root, stem and leaves part which detected the presence of alkaloids, phenols, flavonoids, terpenoids, steroids and tannins in the prepared hydroalcoholic extracts using Soxhlet extraction method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.447
Teacher spread0.391 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Research in Advent TechnologySame topicMorinda citrifolia extract usesFrench-language works237,207