MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2972781556 · doi:10.1109/icarm.2019.8833973

Semantic Segmentation via Structured Refined Prediction and Dual Global Priors

2019· article· en· W2972781556 on OpenAlexaff
Long Chen, Wujing Zhan, Jiajie Liu, Wei Tian, Dongpu Cao

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Neural Network Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSegmentationArtificial intelligencePrior probabilityConvolution (computer science)Context (archaeology)ResidualTransformation (genetics)Convolutional neural networkBoundary (topology)Scale (ratio)Set (abstract data type)Computer visionPattern recognition (psychology)AlgorithmArtificial neural networkMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Deep residual network and multi-scale context module become two key ingredients in recent researches which made great progress in semantic segmentation tasks. The multi-scale features utilized by these networks are also proven to be effective in refining object boundaries. However, regular convolution kernels are inherently limited to geometric transformation due to the fixed structure. Additionally, when integrating multi-scale information in boundary detection, the capability of global attention starts to degrade and the problem of inconsistent intra-class segmentation will occur. To solve above problems, we propose two novel architectures dubbed as Deformable Residual Boundary (DRB) module and Dual Global Prior (DGP) module. The DRB module can learn more refined boundary information from non-rigid geometric structures by deformable convolutions. The extracted information will be further embedded into the branches of an encoder-decoder architecture to handle the deformation of objects. For multi-scale fusion, the DGP module utilizes global priors to enhance the global attention, which alleviates the inconsistent intra-class segmentation problem especially when dealing with object surfaces of different textures/resolutions. We achieve a mean IOU value of 80.3% without coarse set, outperforming state-of-the-art approaches. When training with the coarse set, the final mIOU of the proposed method is 80.9%, also competitive to other approaches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.597
Threshold uncertainty score0.286

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207