MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2972815894 · doi:10.13001/1081-3810.3950

Consistency of Quaternion Matrix Equations $AX^{\star}-XB=C$ and $X-AX^\star B=C$

2019· article· en· W2972815894 on OpenAlexafffund
Xin Liu, Qing‐Wen Wang, Yang Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronic Journal of Linear Algebra · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMatrix Theory and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsTransposeStar (game theory)QuaternionMathematicsUniquenessMatrix (chemical analysis)Complex conjugatePositive-definite matrixHermitian matrixPure mathematicsCombinatoricsMathematical analysisPhysicsGeometryEigenvalues and eigenvectorsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For a given ordered units triple $\{q_1, q_2, q_3\}$, the solutions to the quaternion matrix equations $AX^{\star}-XB=C$ and $X-AX^{\star}B=C$, $X^{\star} \in \{ X , X^{\eta} , X^* , X^{\eta*}\}$, where $X^*$ is the conjugate transpose of $X$, $X^{\eta}=-\eta X \eta$ and $X^{\eta*}=-\eta X^* \eta$, $\eta \in \{q_1, q_2, q_3\}$, are discussed. Some new real representations of quaternion matrices are used, which enable one to convert $\eta$-conjugate (transpose) matrix equations into some real matrix equations. By using this idea, conditions for the existence and uniqueness of solutions to the above quaternion matrix equations are derived. Also, methods to construct the solutions from some related real matrix equations are presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElectronic Journal of Linear AlgebraSame topicMatrix Theory and AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207