MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2972819392 · doi:10.22215/etd/2018-13450

Investigating a Role for BLADE-ON-PETIOLE Genes in Plant Defense

2018· dissertation· en· W2972819392 on OpenAlexaff
Christopher J. Bergin

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyArabidopsisGeneTranscriptomePlant defense against herbivoryGeneticsDefence mechanismsNPR1Gene familyPlant ImmunityCladeMutantPhylogeneticsGene expressionMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Plants have evolved multiple layers of defense to ward off pathogens.Pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMPs)-triggered immunity (PTI) is the most ancient and basal form of plant defense.BLADE-ON-PETIOLE1/2 (BOP1/2) are members of an evolutionarily conserved subclade of BTB-ankyrin proteins that control plant development within the NON-EXPRESSOR OF PATHOGENESIS-RELATED GENES1 (NPR1) family of plant defense regulators that control systemic acquired resistance.I analyzed the transcriptome of BOP1 overexpressing plants to find a previously undiscovered role for BOPs in plant defense.Gene Ontology analysis revealed that 35% of upregulated genes belong to plant defense pathways with PTI forming the largest group.Among these PTI genes were clade I TGA factors, also essential for BOP-mediated developmental processes.Data validation and direct pathogen testing support the model that BOPs and clade I TGAs co-regulate a subset of genes involved in PTI.These data uncover a dual role for Arabidopsis BOPs in development and defense.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPlant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity→French-language works237,207→