Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A new concept is proposed, which uses results from a multi‐relaxation test to characterize transition of deformation mechanisms in polyethylene (PE) pipes, for plastic deformation from the amorphous phase only to the involvement of the crystalline phase. The former mechanism is believed to lead to brittle fracture, while the latter to ductile fracture. This phenomenon is believed to be related to the transition from ductile to brittle (DB) fracture that has been observed in creep tests of PE pipes by reducing the applied stress below a critical level. This paper presents results from 6 PE pipes of different density and molecular weight distribution. The results suggest that high‐density PE pipes require a higher deformation level for the DB transition than the medium‐density PE pipes. The results also suggest that the trend of change in the critical stress level for the DB transition is close to the trend of change in the hydrostatic design base, but the former takes less than two weeks to complete, while the latter more than 1 year. Therefore, the multi‐relaxation test can be used as an alternative method to characterize PE pipe performance, as a means for preliminary screening or in‐service monitoring of pipe performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".