MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2972847291 · doi:10.23919/acc.2019.8815166

Identification of Hammerstein Systems with Rate-Dependent Hysteresis Nonlinearities in a Class of Smart Material-Based Actuators

2019· article· en· W2972847291 on OpenAlexaff
Khaled F. Aljanaideh, Mohammad Al Janaideh, Micky Rakotondrabe, Deepa Kundur

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPiezoelectric Actuators and Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)HysteresisActuatorNonlinear systemSIGNAL (programming language)Impulse (physics)Linear systemCascadeComputer scienceMathematicsPhysicsEngineeringMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In [1], we introduced an algorithm to identify rate-independent hysteresis nonlinearities of a class of smart material-based actuators, which is modeled as a Hammerstein system, that is, a cascade of a Prandtl-Ishlinskii (PI) hysteresis nonlinearity with a linear dynamic system. In this paper, we extend the results in [1] to Hammerstein systems with rate-dependent hysteresis nonlinearities. We consider a rate-dependent PI model, which has been used to model rate-dependent hysteresis nonlinearities in smart micro-positioning actuators such as piezoceramic actuators and magnetostrictive actuators. The rate-dependent hysteresis nonlinearity, the linear dynamic system, and the intermediate signal between them are assumed to be unknown. Least squares is used with a finite impulse response (FIR) model structure to identify the linear part of the Hammerstein system. Then, the output of the Hammerstein system is used along with the identified model of the linear plant to reconstruct the unknown intermediate signal. A nonparametric model of the rate-dependent hysteresis loop is obtained by plotting the reconstructed intermediate signal versus the input signal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.603
Threshold uncertainty score0.424

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.172
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPiezoelectric Actuators and ControlFrench-language works237,207