Learning a No-Reference Quality Predictor of Stereoscopic Images by Visual Binocular Properties
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this work, we develop a novel no-reference (NR) quality assessment metric for stereoscopic images based on monocular and binocular features, motivated by visual perception properties of the human visual system (HVS) named binocular rivalry and binocular integration. To be more specific, we first calculate the normalized intensity feature maps of right- and left-view images through local contrast normalization, where statistical intensity features are extracted by the histogram of the normalized intensity feature map to represent monocular features. Then, we compute the disparity map of stereoscopic image, with which we extract structure feature map of stereoscopic image based on local binary pattern (LBP). We further extract statistical structure features and statistical depth features from structure feature map and disparity map by histogram to represent binocular features. Finally, we adopt support vector regression (SVR) to train the mapping function from the extracted monocular and binocular features to subjective quality scores. Comparison experiments are conducted on four large-scale stereoscopic image databases and the results demonstrate the promising performance of the proposed method in stereoscopic image quality assessment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".