MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2972955687 · doi:10.1117/12.2528567

Enhancement of spin pumping damping in ferromagnet/CoPt structures (Conference Presentation)

2019· article· en· W2972955687 on OpenAlexaff
Paul Omelchenko

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic properties of thin films
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpin pumpingCondensed matter physicsFerromagnetismSpin Hall effectSpin (aerodynamics)Spin diffusionMagnetic momentSpin polarizationMaterials scienceFerromagnetic resonanceSpinplasmonicsElectronPhysicsMagnetizationMagnetic fieldThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Spin-pumping is the phenomenon by which a pure spin current can be injected into a non-magnetic metal from an adjacent ferromagnet. Spin-pumping into Pt is of great interest since Pt exhibits large inverse spin Hall effect. However, Pt limits the efficiency of spin-pumping due to spin-memory loss at the ferromagnet/Pt interface. By alloying Pt with Co we saw a large enhancement in magnetic damping suggesting a significant increase in spin-pumping efficiency. Analyzing the damping results of ferromagnet/CoPt using spin-pumping model yields to an increase in the spin-mixing parameter by a factor of 4 as compared to ferromagnet/Pt. The enhancement in damping cannot be explained by an increase in the interface spin-memory effect since the spin-diffusion length in CoPt is increased by a factor of 2 as compared to pure Pt. An additional potential source of spin-pumping-like interface damping could be originating form the proximity effect. It is found that proximity effect at the ferromagnet/CoPt interface induces a long-range magnetic moment in CoPt, up to 6nm. Proximity effect can also lead to an increase in fluctuating moment in CoPt, which can then enhance the transfer of magnetic momentum from the ferromagnet to CoPt. In this case, effective spin-pumping parameter will depend on the interaction of spin-correlated clusters in CoPt with the adjacent ferromagnet. This is different from the typically used spin-pumping model where the loss of magnetic moment is mediated by the independent normal-metal electrons reflected at the spin-dependent electron potential at the ferromagnet/normal metal interface.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.433
Threshold uncertainty score0.984

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMagnetic properties of thin filmsFrench-language works237,207