MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Efficacy of Copanlisib Monotherapy in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Marginal Zone Lymphoma: Subset Analysis from the CHRONOS-1 Trial

2017· article· en· W2972977533 on OpenAlexaff
Martin Dreyling, Panayiotis Panayiotidis, Miklós Egyed, George Follows, Luigina Mollica, Arnon Nagler, Muhıt Özcan, Armando Santoro, Tatiane Cristine Ishida, Cindy Lu, Florian Hiemeyer, J. Garcia‐Vargas, Barrett H. Childs, Pier Luigi Zinzani

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsHôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineGastroenterologyLymphomaMarginal zone B-cell lymphomaMarginal zoneB cellImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) is an indolent B-cell malignancy which comprises approximately 10% of non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. Copanlisib is an intravenously administered pan-Class I phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor with predominant activity against PI3K-α and PI3K-δ isoforms. In the recent phase II CHRONOS-1 trial, treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory indolent B-cell lymphoma with copanlisib resulted in an overall response rate (ORR) of 59%. A total of 23 patients (16%) in the trial had MZL histology. We describe here a subset analysis of the MZL patients in CHRONOS-1 . Methods: Patients enrolled into the CHRONOS-1 trial with MZL had to have relapsed after, or were refractory to ≥2 prior lines of treatment. Previous treatment had to include rituximab and an alkylating agent. Copanlisib was administered at a fixed dose of 60 mg via 1-hour I.V. infusion on an intermittent schedule days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Treatment continued until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The subset analysis comprised 23 MZL patients (15 nodal, 4 splenic and 4 MALT lymphomas). Objective tumor response rate (ORR) after ≥4 cycles was assessed per independent radiologic review (Cheson et al., JCO 20:579, 2007). Secondary efficacy endpoints included duration of response (DOR). Adverse events were assessed using the CTCAE (v4.03) coding. Results: The 23 MZL patients, as assessed by the investigator, included 4 (17.4%) mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma, 15 (65.2%) nodal MZL and 4 (17.4%) splenic MZL. Median age was 69 years (range 39-81) and ECOG status 0 and 1 roughly similar (52% and 48%). Prior treatment included a median of 3 (range 2-9) lines of therapy, with 48% being refractory to the last regimen, and 44% refractory to last rituximab regimen. As of the data cutoff date of 20 February, 2017, patients had received a median of 5.8 cycles of treatment with a median duration of treatment of 23 weeks (range 1-138). A total of 16 patients had an objective tumor response, for an ORR of 70%. Complete responses (CR) were observed in 3 (13%) patients, all with splenic MZL. Twelve of 15 (80%) patients with nodal disease had an objective tumor response and 1 of 4 (25%) with MALT had a response. The median DOR had not been reached, with the range being 1-728 days and 85% estimated to be in response at 9 months. Individual plots of tumor shrinkage over time for responders indicated rapid and prolonged responses (See Figure). The most common treatment-emergent AEs (all grade/grade 3+) for the entire CHRONOS-1 study population were transient hyperglycemia (50.7%/41.5%) and hypertension (30.3%/23.9%). Other AEs included decreased neutrophil count (31.7%/25.4%), diarrhea (33.8%/5.6%), lung infection (24.6%/16%), pneumonitis (7%/2.1%), and colitis (0.7%/0.7%). Laboratory toxicities of interest were principally grade-1, including elevated ALT (24.1% all-grade/20.6% grade-1) and AST (30.5% all grade/27% grade 1-2). In the MZL subset, there were no non-fatal opportunistic infections and no deaths attributed to copanlisib. However, there were 3 treatment-related deaths in the total patient population of the CHRONOS-1 study. Conclusions: Copanlisib treatment of relapsed or refractory MZL patients resulted in a promising ORR of 70% and CR rate of 13% in this cohort of 23 patients. Responses were durable, with the median DOR having not yet been reached (85% were estimated to be in response at 9 months), higher than what has been previously reported in the MZL treatment landscape, warranting further study of copanlisib in MZL. Figure: Time course for tumor shrinkage (per investigator assessment) for individual MZL patients achieving an objective tumor responses (per independent central review) while receiving copanlisib treatment. Download : Download high-res image (117KB) Download : Download full-size image Figure . Disclosures Dreyling: Sandoz: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; MorphoSys AG: Consultancy; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Santoro: Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ishida: Bayer SA: Employment. Lu: Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Hiemeyer: Bayer AG, Pharmaceuticals Division: Employment. Garcia-Vargas: Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Childs: 11. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Zinzani: Bayer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Johnson & Johnson: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Verastem: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→