Magnetic Resonance Imaging Texture Analysis Predicts Recurrence in Patients with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The personalization of oncologic treatment using radiomic signatures is mounting in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). We ascertain the predictive ability of 3D volumetric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) texture features on NPC disease recurrence. METHODS: A retrospective study of 58 patients with NPC undergoing primary curative-intent treatment was performed. Forty-two image texture features were extracted from pre-treatment MRI in addition to clinical factors. A multivariate logistic regression was used to model the texture features. A receiver operating characteristic curve on 100 bootstrap samples was used to maximize generalizability to out-of-sample data. A Cox proportional model was used to predict disease recurrence in the final model. RESULTS: A total of 58 patients were included in the study. MRI texture features predicted disease recurrence with an area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity of 0.79, 0.73, and 0.71, respectively. Loco-regional recurrence was predicted with AUC, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.82, 0.73 and 0.74 respectively while prediction for distant metastasis had an AUC, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.92, 0.79 and 0.84, respectively. Texture features on MRI had a hazard ratio of 4.37 (95% confidence interval 1.72-20.2) for disease recurrence when adjusting for age, sex, smoking, and TNM staging. CONCLUSION: Texture features on MRI are independent predictors of NPC recurrence in patients undergoing curative-intent treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".