MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2973022365

Co-designing Benefits Management Structures

2019· article· en· W2973022365 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Ian Murray, Joe Fardin, James J. O’Hara

Bibliographic record

VenueUWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMining and Resource Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersIndigenous and Northern Affairs CanadaAboriginal Affairs and Northern Development CanadaUniversity of MelbourneDepartment of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, IndiaGovernment of Canada
KeywordsIndigenousIdentification (biology)Context (archaeology)Principal (computer security)Political scienceBusinessPublic relationsKnowledge managementGeographyComputer scienceComputer security
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This monograph is intended as a reference for scholars and stakeholders in benefits management structures (BMSs). It should help stakeholders establish structures, consider ways to improve existing structures and to build the body of knowledge on structures and the sharing of that knowledge. We have called the process co-design because we have worked with BMS stakeholders though a series of interviews and focus groups to identify BMS purposes and challenges and to refine and add to the design considerations and best practice suggestions derived from the literature and our analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.018
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.026
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.093

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0180.026
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.005
Scholarly communication0.0080.010
Open science0.0020.010
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia)Same topicMining and Resource ManagementFrench-language works237,207