MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2973054777 · doi:10.23919/acc.2019.8815290

Synthesis of Strictly Negative Imaginary Controllers Using a H∞ Performance Index

2019· article· en· W2973054777 on OpenAlexaff
Ken Lee, James Richard Forbes

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPiezoelectric Actuators and Control
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)InterconnectionPosition (finance)The ImaginaryController (irrigation)Linear matrix inequalityStability (learning theory)Convex optimizationMathematicsComputer scienceRegular polygonControl (management)Mathematical optimizationArtificial intelligenceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Negative imaginary (NI) systems are those characterized by a negative imaginary frequency response. A NI system connected in a positive feedback interconnection with a strictly negative imaginary (SNI) controller is internally stable if and only if a DC gain condition is satisfied. This can be interpreted as a robust stability result in situations where plant uncertainty does not destroy the NI nature of the plant nor the DC gain condition. Motivated by a desire to realize improved closed-loop performance, this paper considers the design of H <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">∞</sub> -optimal SNI controllers. The proposed synthesis method makes use of convex optimization and linear matrix inequality (LMI) tools. Another contribution of this paper is pointing out how to realize tip position control, rather than joint position control, of a flexible manipulator within a NI framework. Numerical simulation results are included.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.812
Threshold uncertainty score0.395

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPiezoelectric Actuators and ControlFrench-language works237,207