Bibliographic record
Abstract
Domain adaptation aims to exploit the supervision knowledge in a source domain for learning prediction models in a target domain. In this article, we propose a novel representation learning-based domain adaptation method, i.e., neural embedding matching (NEM) method, to transfer information from the source domain to the target domain where labeled data is scarce. The proposed approach induces an intermediate common representation space for both domains with a neural network model while matching the embedding of data from the two domains in this common representation space. The embedding matching is based on the fundamental assumptions that a cross-domain pair of instances will be close to each other in the embedding space if they belong to the same class category, and the local geometry property of the data can be maintained in the embedding space. The assumptions are encoded via objectives of metric learning and graph embedding techniques to regularize and learn the semisupervised neural embedding model. We also provide a generalization bound analysis for the proposed domain adaptation method. Meanwhile, a progressive learning strategy is proposed and it improves the generalization ability of the neural network gradually. Experiments are conducted on a number of benchmark data sets and the results demonstrate that the proposed method outperforms several state-of-the-art domain adaptation methods and the progressive learning strategy is promising.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".