Changes in Electroencephalography Activity in Response to Power Mobility Training: A Pilot Project
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: The purposes of this pilot project were to examine the impact of power mobility training on (1) electroencephalography (EEG) activity in children with severe cerebral palsy (CP) and (2) power mobility skill acquisition. Method: A single-subject A–B–A–B research design with a 5-week duration for each phase (20 wk total) was replicated across three participants with severe CP (Gross Motor Function Classification System Level V). Data related to the target behaviour, as represented by EEG activity, were collected each week. Power mobility skills were assessed using the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM), the Wheelchair Skills Checklist (WSC), and the Assessment of Learning Powered mobility use (ALP). Weekly power mobility training was provided during the intervention phases. EEG data were analyzed by means of three measurement metrics (power spectral density, mutual information, and transfer entropy). Results: All three participants demonstrated changes in activation in frontoparietal EEG recordings and clinically significant improvements in power mobility skill acquisition as measured by the COPM as well as by the ALP and WSC. Conclusions: Power mobility training appeared to affect both neuroplastic and skill acquisition. Combining the use of EEG with direct therapist-observation measurement tools may provide a more complete understanding of the impact of power mobility training on children with severe CP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".