MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2973207646 · doi:10.19103/as.2019.0046.19

Integrated management of tortricid pests of tree fruit

2019· book-chapter· en· W2973207646 on OpenAlexaff
A. L. Knight, Gary J. R. Judd, Todd M. Gilligan, Eduardo Fuentes‐Contreras, William B. Walker

Bibliographic record

VenueBurleigh Dodds series in agricultural science · 2019
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect-Plant Interactions and Control
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTortricidaePhytosanitary certificationIntegrated pest managementBiologyAgroforestryGeographyLarvaHorticultureEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A group of relatively small moths in the family Tortricidae is commonly the most destructive insect pests of deciduous tree fruits throughout the world (van der Geest and Evenhuis 1991). Within each geographical area there is typically a defined group of tortricids. This group can include key species whose larvae feed on fruit, externally or internally, and which drives the entire seasonal pest management programme, and any number of external feeders whose larvae may cause sporadic fruit injury and require occasional management. Successful control of tortricids can have a significant impact on the global trade of tree fruits and various phytosanitary regulations are in place to counter their accidental introduction into new areas. This chapter summarizes the recent literature associated with several applied aspects of tortricid management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBurleigh Dodds series in agricultural scienceSame topicInsect-Plant Interactions and ControlFrench-language works237,207