MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2973214388 · doi:10.1386/btwo_00007_1

Linguistically and culturally relevant education on the roof of the world: The collaborative creation of a Ladakhi storybook

2019· article· en· W2973214388 on OpenAlexaff
Patrick F. Dowd

Bibliographic record

VenueBook 2 0 · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSociologyPedagogyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article describes the creation of a culturally and linguistically relevant storybook written for 10–12-year-old children in the Ladakh, a high-altitude region of the Indian Himalayas. Formerly a part of the Tibetan Empire, Ladakh came under Indian rule in the mid-nineteenth century but maintained strong autonomy and close ties with its neighbour to the north until China closed the Ladakh-Tibet border in the late 1950s. In the 1970s the Indian government opened the Ladakh to tourism which resulted in rapid change, transforming the preindustrial, largely agrarian society into one heavily dependent on tourism. In a region where the total population is less than 275,000, in 2016 alone nearly 240,000 tourists visited Ladakh, almost 200,000 of whom were Indian. Language shift from Ladakhi to Hindi and English, as well as a profound sense of cultural alienation, are among the unintended consequences of the tourist industry and thorough incorporation of Ladakh into the Indian market economy. Having interviewed numerous teachers, principals, and education activists in the summer of 2016, they nearly unanimously argued that the lack of culturally relevant, Ladakhi-centric material was a major reason young Ladakhis failed to learn their language well and the cultural values embedded within it. I returned to Ladakh in August 2017 to work with a team of local Ladakhi university students, writers and illustrators to produce a children’s storybook rooted in the people, landscape, language and culture of Ladakh. 1,000 copies were printed in February 2018 and are currently being distributed in Ladakh by the Himalayan Cultural Heritage Foundation. The article describes the collaborative research, writing and illustration that produced the book, as well as how we navigated the delicate balance of honouring colloquial Ladakhi while still respecting the grammar and spelling of the literary Tibetan language on which it is based.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.008
Scholarly communication0.0100.007
Open science0.0020.015
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBook 2 0Same topicEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningFrench-language works237,207