MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2973219032

Palliative care for homeless patients: A practical approach for medical students

2019· article· en· W2973219032 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mithunan Ravindran, Nishwa Shah, Naheed Dosani

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Toronto Medical Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHomelessness and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPalliative careVulnerability (computing)HarmNursingMedicinePsychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, Dr. Naheed Dosani, the founder of the Palliative Education and Care for the Homeless (PEACH) program, shares his insight on topics ranging from integrating structural vulnerability into clinical practice to engendering changes within the community through translation of an idea into a real-world program. PEACH is a community-based organization that aims to provide high-quality and easily accessible palliative care to individuals that are homeless. We explore key tenants of palliative care such as harm reduction and trauma- informed care and their applicability for homeless or transiently housed patients. Dr. Dosani describes the unique elements of PEACH and the Journey Home Hospice (JHH), including accepting referrals from care workers, and the practical logistics of building this successful program in just a few short years.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.576
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.411
Teacher spread0.378 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Toronto Medical JournalSame topicHomelessness and Social IssuesFrench-language works237,207