MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2973233661 · doi:10.37541/plenojure.v8i2.122

Harmonisasi Peraturan Perundang-undangan Terhadap Bentuk Perjanjian Melalui Telemarketing

2019· article· id· W2973233661 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePLENO JURE · 2019
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhysicsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Perkembangan teknologi menimbulkan praktek-praktek perjanjian yang dalam implementasinya tidak lagi menjadi suatu hambatan demi terwujudnya kepastian hukum. Bentuk perjanjian melalui telemarketing adalah salah satu dari dampak perkembangan teknologi saat ini. Penelitian ini mencoba menganalisis legalitas pengaturan bentuk perjanjian telemarketing dalam peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku. Penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian normatif yaitu menganalisis aturan perundang-undangan yang berkaitan dengan penelitian ini. Hasil penelitian ini mejawab praktek perjanjian telemarketing secara legalitasnya dalam beberapa ketentuan aturan perundang-undangan tidak lah menyalahi ketentuan, akan tetapi, dalam prakteknya perjanjian bentuk ini tidak dibenarkan karena terkait dengan sulitnya pembuktian, serta adanya ancaman pidana bagi pihak pelaku usaha yang menggunakan nomor seluler nasabah tanpa izin dari nasabah (konsumen).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.760
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it