MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2973277994

RFI Detection and Correction on Cold Target of FY-3D/MWRI

2019· article· en· W2973277994 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Shiyue Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueUtah State Research and Scholarship (Utah State University) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInfrared Target Detection Methodologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceEnvironmental scienceMeteorologyPhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Microwave Radiation Imager (MWRI) on-board FengYun-3D (FY-3D) meteorological satellite is a total power, 10 channel conic scan microwave imager. Observing land/ocean surface and atmosphere from 10GHz to 89GHz, V and H polarization. During the on-orbit test of FY-3D/MWRI, RFI effect was found in some area for 10GHz and 18GHz separately. Both calibration data, including warm target and cold target, and earth environment observing data was consider to cause the RFI noise. 1 month data was used to find out the error source, result show that most of the RFI noise comes from cold target. Different from other conic scan microwave imager on-orbit, such as AMSR2, SSMIS and GMI, FY-3D/MWRI using an end to end calibration mechanism. A big cold-target reflector (1 m in diameter) was used on the top of the platform. In some specific locations of the orbit, emission of different source was reflected by the cold-target reflector and then reflected by the main reflector to the receiver. Detail results show that for 10V channel and 10H channel, most of the RFI effect was found during the platform flying pass the west Europe (south of France), while for 18V channel and 18H channel, most of the RFI effect was found during the platform flying pass the west of North America (west part of Canada/US border). Compared with Geostationary satellite that in-orbit operation, we found that this result shows a good agreement with television transmission satellite, including location and operational frequency. Based on this result, a new filter algorithm was designed to do the correction. Result show that most of the RFI effect in the former area was corrected.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUtah State Research and Scholarship (Utah State University)Same topicInfrared Target Detection MethodologiesFrench-language works237,207