La Revolución de 1868 en El Puerto de Santa María (Cádiz): Cuatro relatos de Jesuitas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
espanolDamos a conocer, en su traduccion al espanol, el documento titulado “Expulsion de Port Ste Marie”, publicado originalmente en lengua francesa en la revista jesuita Lettres des scolastiques de Laval correspondiente al mes de diciembre de 1868. Se trata de cuatro cronicas -unas diez paginas de la revista- sobre la dispersion de las dos comunidades jesuitas que habia en El Puerto de Santa Maria al estallar la revolucion de septiembre de 1868. Aunque los relatos son todos anonimos, sabemos que sus autores -miembros de la Compania de Jesus, a los que hemos procurado identificar- fueron testigos presenciales de los hechos que se refieren. La cercania cronologica a los acontecimientos narrados y los pormenores que aportan, hacen de estas cronicas una fuente de interes para la historia local. EnglishWe share, in its Spanish translation, the document entitled “Expulsion de Port Ste Marie”, originally published in French in the Jesuit journal Lettres des scolastiques de Laval for the month of December 1868. The four chronicles -some ten pages of the journalcover the exodus of the two Jesuit communities that existed in El Puerto de Santa Maria at the outbreak of the Spanish Revolution of September 1868. Although the narratives are all anonymous, we know that their authors -members of the Society of Jesus, whom we have tried to identify- were eyewitnesses to the incidents that are recounted. The chronological closeness to the narrated events and the details they provide, make these chronicles a source of interest for local history.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".