La Revolución de 1868 en El Puerto de Santa María (Cádiz): Cuatro relatos de Jesuitas
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
espanolDamos a conocer, en su traduccion al espanol, el documento titulado “Expulsion de Port Ste Marie”, publicado originalmente en lengua francesa en la revista jesuita Lettres des scolastiques de Laval correspondiente al mes de diciembre de 1868. Se trata de cuatro cronicas -unas diez paginas de la revista- sobre la dispersion de las dos comunidades jesuitas que habia en El Puerto de Santa Maria al estallar la revolucion de septiembre de 1868. Aunque los relatos son todos anonimos, sabemos que sus autores -miembros de la Compania de Jesus, a los que hemos procurado identificar- fueron testigos presenciales de los hechos que se refieren. La cercania cronologica a los acontecimientos narrados y los pormenores que aportan, hacen de estas cronicas una fuente de interes para la historia local. EnglishWe share, in its Spanish translation, the document entitled “Expulsion de Port Ste Marie”, originally published in French in the Jesuit journal Lettres des scolastiques de Laval for the month of December 1868. The four chronicles -some ten pages of the journalcover the exodus of the two Jesuit communities that existed in El Puerto de Santa Maria at the outbreak of the Spanish Revolution of September 1868. Although the narratives are all anonymous, we know that their authors -members of the Society of Jesus, whom we have tried to identify- were eyewitnesses to the incidents that are recounted. The chronological closeness to the narrated events and the details they provide, make these chronicles a source of interest for local history.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it