MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2973367259 · doi:10.5120/ijca2019919352

EEG based Emotion Recognition using SVM and LibSVM

2019· article· en· W2973367259 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Computer Applications · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicEmotion and Mood Recognition
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSupport vector machineElectroencephalographyPattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceEmotion recognitionEmotion detectionSpeech recognitionMachine learningPsychologyNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we solely focus on the EEG dataset. Using SVM classifier with external library LibSVM (3.23), we have classified our EEG SEED dataset and have achieved tremendous improvement in the accuracy and performance. Moreover, we have listed and explained the different approaches followed to improvise the performance and accuracy of our dataset. Further, we have also compared various existing approaches performed on our dataset using various classifiers -ELM, SVM with KNN, SVM with SEED dataset and SVM with DEAP dataset. By using library LibSVM (3.23), we increased the performance of each run by 4% finally resulting with 79.38% accuracy having tensor flow environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.970
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it