The interplay of abrasion, impact and salt scaling damage in fibre-reinforced concrete
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This investigation aims to study the abrasion and impact resistance of fibre-reinforced concrete before and after exposure to salt scaling. Different types of steel fibre and different mixture compositions were used to improve the strength and resistance of the tested mixtures. The variables were the type of steel fibres, surface condition of steel fibres (coated and uncoated), length of steel fibres (35 and 60 mm), volume of steel fibres in the mixture (0, 0·35 and 1%), end condition of steel fibres (single- and double-hooked ends), coarse aggregate size (10 and 20 mm), coarse aggregate/fine aggregate ratio (0·7 and 2) and cement content (300 and 550 kg/m 3 ). The results indicated that the uncoated steel fibres experienced some rust after the exposure to salt scaling, causing more deterioration and higher surface scaling than coated steel fibres. The results also revealed that the samples that were exposed to salt scaling showed a noticeable reduction in the abrasion and impact resistance compared with samples that were not exposed to salt scaling. Adding steel fibres, however, alleviated this reduction and contributed to enhancing the impact and abrasion resistance of scaled concrete surfaces.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".