VEPTR Treatment of Early Onset Scoliosis in Children Without Rib Abnormalities: Long-term Results of a Prospective, Multicenter Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In 2007, this prospective study on vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib (VEPTR) treatment of early onset scoliosis in children without rib abnormalities was initiated. Two-year follow-up results have previously been reported. This study examines whether, at 5-year follow-up, VEPTR continues to control scoliosis and allow spinal growth. METHODS: A prospective, multicenter, observational cohort design was used. Patients underwent traditional VEPTR implantation ≥5 years before analysis. Preimplantation and last available images were compared, regardless of whether VEPTR remained in vivo. Additional analysis was performed if VEPTR was in vivo ≥5 years. RESULTS: This study included 59 patients (mean age at VEPTR implantation, 6.1±2.4 y; mean follow-up, 6.9±1.4 y). Currently, 24 patients still have VEPTR, whereas 24 have converted (13 fusions, 6 MCGR, 3 growing rods, 1 hybrid, and 1 Shilla). Three have had VEPTR explanted, 6 are unknown, and 2 have deceased. On last available imaging (n=59; mean follow-up, 4.8±1.9 y), scoliosis improved from 71.8±18.0 degrees preoperatively to 60.9±20.3 degrees (P<0.001) and T1- T12 height increased (15.8±3.2 to 19.3±3.8 cm, P<0.001). T1-S1 height also increased (24.8±4.4 to 31.2±5.3 cm, P<0.001), representing 119% age-matched growth. Composite improvement of scoliosis, T1-T12, and T1-S1 height was achieved in 79% of patients. A subset of 29 patients with VEPTR was analyzed at most recent follow-up ≥5 years while VEPTR remained in vivo (24 patients with VEPTR above, and 5 who later converted to other devices). Mean age at implantation was 5.0±2.2 years, with a mean VEPTR treatment duration of 6.2±1.1 years. Scoliosis improved from preoperatively (69.3±14.5 to 61.6±16.1 degrees, P=0.006), with mild recurrence from postoperative to 5 years. T1-T12 height increased (15.0±3.3 to 18.7±3.3 cm, P<0.001) and T1-S1 height increased (23.7±4.5 to 30.1±4.6 cm, P<0.001), representing 83% age-matched growth. Composite improvement was achieved in 83% of patients. Instrumented sagittal length also increased during this period (21.8±4.2 to 30.3±5.1 cm, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: At a 5-year follow-up, VEPTR continues to control scoliosis and allow spinal growth. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II-prospective cohort, therapeutic study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".