MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2973494518

De Jonge Jury 2019, een jeugdroman uit Canada en debutanten van eigen bodem

2019· article· nl· W2973494518 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rob van Veen

Bibliographic record

VenueLevende Talen Magazine · 2019
Typearticle
Languagenl
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicNarrative Theory and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJuryTheologyArtHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophyLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In juni vond in Utrecht de prijsuitreiking plaats van de Jonge Jury. Een korte terugblik voor wie er niet bij was. Verder aandacht voor het nieuwste boek van de Canadese Susin Nielsen, die met Adres onbekend een sprankelende jeugdroman schreef. Tot slot een korte bespreking van Lef , een beklemmend verhaal van een debuterend schrijfster uit eigen land, Erna Barth.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.297
Threshold uncertainty score0.598

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0190.006
Scholarly communication0.0100.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0620.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLevende Talen MagazineSame topicNarrative Theory and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207