MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2973627286 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2019.2942334

Joint Multi-User Computation Offloading and Data Caching for Hybrid Mobile Cloud/Edge Computing

2019· article· en· W2973627286 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaolong Yang, Zesong Fei, Jianchao Zheng, Ning Zhang, Alagan Anpalagan

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersNational Postdoctoral Program for Innovative TalentsNatural Science Foundation of Beijing MunicipalityNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceComputation offloadingCacheCloud computingMobile edge computingEdge computingDistributed computingComputationEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionMobile deviceMobile cloud computingEnergy consumptionServerComputer networkAlgorithmOperating systemEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we investigate a hybrid mobile cloud/edge computing system with coexistence of centralized cloud and mobile edge computing, which enables computation offloading and data caching to improve the performance of users. Computation offloading and data caching decisions are jointly optimized to minimize the total execution delay at the mobile user side, while satisfying the constrains in terms of the maximum tolerable energy consumption of each user, the computation capability of each MEC server, and the cache capacity of each access point (AP). The formulated problem is non-convex and challenging because of the highly coupled decision variables. To address such an untractable problem, we first transform the original problem into an equivalent convex one by McCormick envelopes and introducing auxiliary variables. To the end, we propose a distributed algorithm based on the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM), which can achieve near optimal computation offloading and data caching decisions. The proposed algorithm has lower computational complexity compared to the centralized algorithm. Simulation results are presented to verify that the proposed algorithm can effectively reduce computing delay for end users while ensuring the performance of each user.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations94
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular TechnologySame topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207