Analisis pertumbuhan ekonomi dan ketimpangan pembangunan di Wilayah Sumatera
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper aims to analyze economic growth and inequality of development in the region of Sumatra. The study used panel data of provinces in Sumatra region during the period 2011-2015. The method of analysis used is descriptive research method and panel data regression. Based on the results of the analysis is known that economic growth in the region of Sumatra tend to decrease, whereas development inequality ranges from IW (Williamson Index) 0.406-0.446. The highest level of inequality occured in 2012 in South Sumatra Province of 0,876 and the lowest occured in 2014 in Lampung Province in 0,103. Based on the result of panel data regression, it is known that simultaneously investment, government expenditure, agglomeration, and labor influence to economic growth. Likewise, simultaneously investment, government spending, agglomeration, and labor also have an effect on development inequality.. Keyword: Economic Growth, Development Inequality, Investment, Government Spending, Agglomeration, Labor Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pertumbuhan ekonomi serta meninjau seberapa besar ketimpangan pembangunan masing-masing provinsi di wilayah Sumatera. Penelitian ini menggunakan data panel provinsi-provinsi di Wilayah Sumatera selama periode 2011-2015. Metode analisis yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian deskriptif dan regresi data panel. Berdasarkan hasil analisis diketahui bahwa pertumbuhan ekonomi di wilayah Sumatera cenderung mengalami penurunan, sedangkan ketimpangan pembangunan berkisar antara IW 0,406-0,446. Tingkat ketimpangan tertinggi terjadi tahun 2012 di Provinsi Sumatera Selatan sebesar 0,876 dan terendah terjadi tahun 2014 di Provinsi Lampung dengan angka 0,103. Berdasarkan hasil regresi data panel diketahui bahwa secara simultan investasi, belanja pemerintah, aglomerasi, dan tenaga kerja berpengaruh terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi. Demikian juga, secara simultan investasi, belanja pemerintah, aglomerasi, dan tenaga kerja berpengaruh juga terhadap ketimpangan pembangunan.. Kata Kunci : Pertumbuhan Ekonomi, Ketimpangan Pembangunan, Investasi, Belanja Pemerintah, Aglomerasi, Tenaga Kerja
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".