MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2973974367 · doi:10.3917/crii.084.0081

Le mouvement pour la justice migrante : une histoire montréalaise

2019· article· fr· W2973974367 on OpenAlex
Adrien Jouan

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCritique internationale · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Refugees, and Integration
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesSociologyArtEthnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Si l’étude des mobilisations autour de la cause des migrants constitue en France et aux États-Unis un domaine de recherche bien développé, il en va tout autrement au Canada, où ces luttes – pourtant bien présentes et observables – n’ont que rarement retenu l’attention des sociologues. Sur la base de données tirées d’une enquête ethnographique de plusieurs années au sein d’un collectif militant de Montréal, je retrace l’histoire de ce que les activistes canadiens nomment le mouvement pour la justice migrante : tout d’abord, son émergence et son ancrage dans l’altermondialisme canadien (2000-2002) ; ensuite, l’épisode crucial de la lutte des sans-statuts algériens (2002-2003) ; enfin, les grandes lignes de l’évolution du mouvement, d’abord centré sur un objectif de régularisation des immigrants sans statut (2004-2007), puis de plus en plus tourné vers des formes de résistance inspirées des mouvements de villes sanctuaires (2010- 2018).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.818
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it