MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2974010641 · doi:10.31333/kihm.2019.7.1.27

Development of Chemical Accident Response Information Sheets for Phosgene

2019· article· en· W2974010641 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Eun-Hye Kwon, Jisu Bae, Young‐Sam Yoon, Tae-Wan Jeon, Sun-Kyoung Shin

Bibliographic record

VenueKorean Journal of Hazardous Materials · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicRisk and Safety Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhosgeneMedicineChemistryEnvironmental scienceToxicologyOrganic chemistryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

초록·키워드 목차 오류제보하기 Korea"s chemical industry is directly or indirectly related to almost all industries. In addition, it occupies a very large proportion of the industrial scale. In particular, Ulsan, Yeosu, and other chemical complexes have been in operation for more than 50 years. Therefore, as the number of maintenance and repair increases due to the deterioration of facilities, the risk of large-scale fire explosion is also increasing. In this study, similar to the technical report of accident response technology by the US and Canada Environmental Agency, it provided key information on the environmental diffusion, toxic effect and accident response of phosgene available to the first responders. Phosgene is photodegraded by hydroxyl radicals in the atmosphere and has a half-life of 44 years. The half-life due to hydrolysis was calculated to be 113 years (20 to 630 years), and it was found that there was persistence to the atmosphere. In the case of phosgene, the chemical management law in Korea is managed as an accident-prone substance, and a management plan for phosgene and mixtures containing 1% or more of phosgene is prepared and submitted. Three clear clinical pathological stages have been reported after exposure to phosgene at 120-1,200 mg / m3-min. Stage 1 is painful in the eyes and neck, with chest tightness, often accompanied by dyspnea, wheezing, and coughing. The second stage or incubation period can be maintained for up to 24 hours, depending on the exposure level and duration, often without symptoms. The third stage is pulmonary edema, which can lead to death. The acute REL, the exposure level that is expected to have no adverse health effects on phosgene inhalation, is set at a value of 0.004 mg / m3. In addition, RfC, which is the exposure reference value determined to have no harmful effects when the chemical is inhaled into the human body, is set to 0.0003 mg / m3. The fire suppression method should stop the gas flow before the fire suppression and notify the fire department to report the fire location and the risk. In case of tank fire, it should be suppressed from the unmanned hose support or monitor nozzle as far as possible. Containers that have been exposed to fire should be cooled with large quantities of water and water should not enter the container. When accompanied by a fire accident, the evacuation distance is about 1,600m. In case of fire, extinguishing agent should be extinguished by water spray, water spray, carbon dioxide, general foam. #chemical accident #information sheets #phosgene #environmental diffusion #toxic effects ABSTRACTⅠ. 서론Ⅱ. 연구내용 및 방법Ⅲ. 결과 및 고찰Ⅳ. 결론References

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.155

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0460.030

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKorean Journal of Hazardous MaterialsSame topicRisk and Safety AnalysisFrench-language works237,207