Numerical simulation of flow over ogee crested spillways under high hydraulic head ratio
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ogee spillway is one of the most common types of the spillway. Researchers have attempted to investigate the hydraulics of ogee structure under hydraulic heads near the design head. Herein, an ogee-crested spillway is studied at heads significantly greater than the design head. The efforts are undertaken to study the hydrodynamic field under high head ratio conditions by conducting a numerical simulation using OpenFOAM with five turbulence closures including standard k–ε, realizable k–ε, RNG k–ε, k–ω SST and LRR. The comparisons of flow parameters under different head ratios with the experimental data demonstrated that the LRR model had the best performance, which shows its strength in cases dealing with flow separation or significant streamline curvature. It is found that with increasing hydraulic head, up to seven times that of the design head, the flow separation zone grows linearly. Discharge coefficients are studied for a wide range of head ratios. It is concluded that increasing head ratio up to five leads to an increase in the discharge coefficient due to decreasing pressure on the ogee crest. As head ratio increases to greater values, the discharge coefficient drops suddenly due to some changes in the pressure field.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it