MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2974117109 · doi:10.1111/dmcn.14351

Development curves of communication and social interaction in individuals with cerebral palsy

2019· article· en· W2974117109 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Siok Swan Tan, Marloes van Gorp, Jeanine M. Voorman, Johanna Geytenbeek, Heleen A. Reinders‐Messelink, Marjolijn Ketelaar, Annet J. Dallmeijer, Marij E. Roebroeck

Bibliographic record

VenueDevelopmental Medicine & Child Neurology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversitair Medisch Centrum GroningenFonds NutsOhraVrije Universiteit AmsterdamMcMaster University
KeywordsCerebral palsyIntellectual disabilityGross Motor Function Classification SystemPsychologyVineland Adaptive Behavior ScaleDevelopmental psychologyCoping (psychology)Gross motor skillRehabilitationMotor skillClinical psychologyAdaptive behaviorPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aim To determine development curves of communication and social interaction from childhood into adulthood for individuals with cerebral palsy ( CP ). Method This Pediatric Rehabilitation Research in the Netherlands ( PERRIN )‐ DECADE study longitudinally assessed 421 individuals with CP , aged from 1 to 20 years at baseline, after 13 years ( n =121 at follow‐up). Communication and social interactions were assessed using the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales. We estimated the average maximum performance limit (level) and age at which 90% of the limit was reached (age 90 ) using nonlinear mixed‐effects modeling. Results One‐hundred individuals without intellectual disability were aged 21 to 34 years at follow‐up (39 females, 61 males) (mean age [ SD ] 28y 5mo [3y 11mo]). Limits of individuals without intellectual disability, regardless of Gross Motor Function Classification System ( GMFCS ) level, approached the maximum score and were significantly higher than those of individuals with intellectual disability. Ages 90 ranged between 3 and 4 years for receptive communication, 6 and 7 years for expressive communication and interrelationships, 12 and 16 years for written communication, 13 and 16 years for play and leisure, and 14 and 16 years for coping. Twenty‐one individuals with intellectual disability were between 21 and 27 years at follow‐up (8 females, 13 males) (mean age [ SD ] 24y 7mo [1y 8mo]). Individuals with intellectual disability in GMFCS level V showed the least favourable development, but variation between individuals with intellectual disability was large. Interpretation Individuals with CP and without intellectual disability show developmental curves of communication and social interactions similar to typically developing individuals, regardless of their level of motor function. Those with intellectual disability reach lower performance levels and vary largely in individual development. What this paper adds Communication and social interactions in individuals with cerebral palsy without intellectual disability develop similarly to typically developing individuals. Communication and social interactions of individuals with intellectual disability develop less favourably and show large variation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.537

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDevelopmental Medicine & Child NeurologySame topicCerebral Palsy and Movement DisordersFrench-language works237,207