MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2974126132 · doi:10.1080/08322473.2019.1667170

Public Relations: Art Therapy Pedagogy Out of Bounds (Relations publiques : la pédagogie de l’art-thérapie hors limites)

2019· article· fr· W2974126132 on OpenAlexaffabout
Pamela Whitaker, Maria Riccardi

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Art Therapy Association Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArt Therapy and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsConcordia UniversityUniversité du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArt therapyCurriculumStudioSociologyContext (archaeology)PedagogyChoreographyPsychologyVisual artsArtPsychotherapistHistoryArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Art therapy pedagogy associated with the Art Hives network at Concordia University (Montréal, Quebec) and cultural practicums at Ulster University (Belfast, Northern Ireland) share in common a movement to develop learning studios that encourage public relations—unscripted relational encounters with activists, artists, allied professionals, and social practitioners that inform art therapy practice. The curriculum is composed through collaborations, with the art therapy educator becoming the curator of an educational assemblage that is beyond the boundaries of the university itself. This is pedagogy as civic practice, where knowledge parameters of the art therapy profession are transgressed and moved, as a choreography that extends beyond boundaries of habitual learning. This article encourages art therapy educators to devise multicentered learning studios (in public places) that support personal and social concerns. In this context art therapy education is constructed as a counterpoint to academic introversion. The proposal here is to mobilize art therapy education as an activist-informed reciprocation of ideas, actions, and resources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.321
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0300.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Art Therapy Association JournalSame topicArt Therapy and Mental HealthFrench-language works237,207