Dome Roof Fall Geohazards of Full-Seam Chamber with Ultra-Large Section in Coal Mine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The roof fall hazard is more likely to take place within chamber with ultra-large section, which would not only damage mechanical equipment, but also cause casualties. In this paper, the strap joint chamber of the Tashan coal mine is studied, and finite and discrete element method (FDEM) is used to establish the numerical model of the roof fall of the chamber dome. The simulation results show that the chamber dome mainly undergoes shear failure and forms a large number of cracks. With further development and penetration of cracks, a distinct roof separation is found in the chamber dome. When the crack develops to the dome surface of the chamber, under the effect of the mine pressure, the coal body is separated from the surface of the chamber and the roof fall hazard occurs. Based on the mechanism of roof fall hazard of the chamber dome, it is concluded that improving the shear strength of the surrounding rock and reducing the crack penetration are the main ways to control the roof fall. Therefore, the high-strength anchor bolt and cable support is adopted to fill the cracks and improve the shear strength of the surrounding rock. The result showed that the roof separation of the chamber dome in the field is confined to 0.012 m. The surrounding rock is well controlled and no roof fall occurs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".