MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2974158502 · doi:10.1101/777979

Contribution of NPY Y <sub>5</sub> Receptors to the Reversible Structural Remodeling Of Basolateral Amygdala Dendrites in Male Rats Associated with NPY-mediated Stress Resilience

2019· preprint· en· W2974158502 on OpenAlexafffund
Sheldon D. Michaelson, Ana Pamela Miranda Tapia, Amanda McKinty, Heika Silveira Villarroel, James P. Mackay, Janice H. Urban, William F. Colmers

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2019
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicStress Responses and Cortisol
Canadian institutionsWomen and Children’s Health Research InstituteUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchFondation pour la Recherche MédicaleNational Institutes of HealthUniversity of AlbertaAlberta InnovatesAlberta Innovates - Health Solutions
KeywordsNeuropeptide Y receptorBasolateral amygdalaInternal medicineEndocrinologyReceptorAgonistNeuroscienceBiologyChemistryNeuropeptideMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Endogenous neuropeptide Y (NPY) and corticotrophin-releasing factor (CRF) modulate the responses of the Basolateral amygdala (BLA) to stress, and are associated respectively with the development of stress resilience and vulnerability. We characterized the persistent effects of repeated NPY and CRF treatment on the structure and function of BLA principal neurons (PN) in a novel organotypic slice culture (OTC) model of rat BLA, and examined the contributions of specific NPY receptor subtypes to these neural and behavioral effects. In BLA principal neurons within the OTCs, repeated NPY treatment caused persistent attenuation of excitatory input and induced dendritic hypotrophy via Y 5 receptors; conversely, CRF increased excitatory input and induced hypertrophy of BLA PNs. Repeated treatment of OTCs with NPY followed by an identical treatment with CRF, or vice versa inhibited or reversed all structural changes in OTCs. These structural responses to NPY or CRF required calcineurin or CaMKII, respectively. Finally, repeated intra-BLA injections of NPY or a Y 5 receptor agonist increased social interaction and recapitulated structural changes in BLA neurons seen in OTCs, while a Y 5 receptor antagonist prevented NPY’s effects both on behavior and on structure. These results implicate the Y 5 receptor in the long-term, anxiolytic-like effects of NPY in the BLA, consistent with an intrinsic role in stress buffering, and highlight a remarkable mechanism by which BLA neurons may adapt to different levels of stress. Moreover, BLA OTCs offer a robust model to study mechanisms associated with resilience and vulnerability to stress in BLA. Significance Statement Within the basolateral amygdala (BLA), Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is associated with buffering the neural stress response induced by CRF, and promoting stress resilience. We used a novel organotypic slice culture (OTC) model of BLA, complemented with in vivo studies, to examine the cellular mechanisms associated with the actions of NPY. In OTCs, repeated NPY treatment reduces the complexity of the dendritic extent of anxiogenic BLA principal neurons, making them less excitable. NPY, via activation of Y5 receptors, additionally inhibits and reverses the increases in dendritic extent and excitability induced by the stress hormone, corticotropin releasing factor (CRF). This NPY-mediated neuroplasticity indicates that resilience or vulnerability to stress may thus involve neuropeptide-mediated dendritic remodeling in BLA PNs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicStress Responses and Cortisol→French-language works237,207→